"sm70- why not Duesenberg?" (sm70-whynotduesenberg)
05/06/2017 at 22:26 • Filed to: None | 6
| 25 |
So here’s a pair of pristine ones I saw today, a ‘70 Oldsmobile Ninety-Eight convertible and a ‘73 Coupe DeVille.
smobgirl
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
05/06/2017 at 22:28 |
|
Nooooo I have nightmares about land yachts.
For Sweden
> smobgirl
05/06/2017 at 22:30 |
|
But they’re good land yachts Smob
fhrblig
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
05/06/2017 at 22:34 |
|
My inner 65-year-old is nodding appreciatively. Who am I kidding, so am I.
WilliamsSW
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
05/06/2017 at 22:37 |
|
Gorgeous - and I love the plate on the Olds. More Berkshire pilgrims, I’m sure—
Logansteno: Bought a VW?
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
05/06/2017 at 22:38 |
|
Gib yellow caddy pls
Goggles Pizzano
> For Sweden
05/06/2017 at 22:42 |
|
Is there really such a thing as a bad barge?
For Sweden
> Goggles Pizzano
05/06/2017 at 22:43 |
|
There is not Gaggles
smobgirl
> For Sweden
05/06/2017 at 22:47 |
|
I learned how to drive in one...which is why I drive a Fiat now.
For Sweden
> smobgirl
05/06/2017 at 22:49 |
|
Not many people realize this, but FIAT stand for Freaking Incredible Automotive Transportation
smobgirl
> Goggles Pizzano
05/06/2017 at 22:50 |
|
How did you find my teenage car?
sm70- why not Duesenberg?
> smobgirl
05/06/2017 at 23:09 |
|
wat
pip bip - choose Corrour
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
05/06/2017 at 23:10 |
|
only if they suspension to match
sm70- why not Duesenberg?
> WilliamsSW
05/06/2017 at 23:11 |
|
Actually so far all the cool cars I’ve posted have local plates.
Your boy, BJR
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
05/06/2017 at 23:16 |
|
EUUGGGGHHHH NOT A ‘72.
sm70- why not Duesenberg?
> Your boy, BJR
05/06/2017 at 23:16 |
|
‘71? ‘73?
Your boy, BJR
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
05/06/2017 at 23:18 |
|
‘73.
sm70- why not Duesenberg?
> Your boy, BJR
05/06/2017 at 23:18 |
|
Ugh ‘73 got it.
C62030
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
05/06/2017 at 23:19 |
|
I would do such illegal things for that Cadillac. My guy also tells me people can survive after selling both kidneys, so that’s an option.
Your boy, BJR
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
05/06/2017 at 23:24 |
|
I only say this because the ‘72 has the best Cadillac front end ever and the ‘73 is one of the worst.
Dem horizontal bars.
Land_Yacht_225
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
05/06/2017 at 23:29 |
|
This is flaring my need for a ‘75 Fleetwood and A ‘78 Mark V!
sm70- why not Duesenberg?
> Your boy, BJR
05/06/2017 at 23:33 |
|
As long as we aren’t being overly hyperbolic or dramatic.
Vicente Esteve
> Your boy, BJR
05/07/2017 at 00:36 |
|
Im looking for differences but can find none.
shop-teacher
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
05/07/2017 at 08:07 |
|
Niiiiiiiiiiiiice!
V8Demon - Prefers Autos for drag racing. Fite me!
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
05/07/2017 at 08:29 |
|
Turbineguy: Nom de Zoom
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
05/07/2017 at 12:56 |
|
When I was a kid my dad had two Olds 98s. A ‘68 coupe and a ‘76 Regency sedan. (Complete with light blue velour interior. Sexy.) Either would have made a great artificial reef somewhere.